43/17
Is it a sin?
Plot
An aspiring chef and a recent divorcee find their lives changed forever when a chance meeting brings them together in a deep, thrilling decade-long affair. Director John Crowley also directed Andrew Garfield in Garfield’s first film, Boy A (2007). Written by Al Hazan Performed by Allie Hazan. Non-Linear Structure: The double-edged sword we live in is the bold choice of storytelling to use non-linear structure.
A linear approach could have allowed for a deeper connection
While this adds complexity to the story, making it feel like a series of fragmented flashbacks or dreamlike flashbacks, it comes at the cost of emotional connection. The constant jumping between different moments of the relationship prevents the audience from fully immersing themselves in the main events. As a result, some important moments feel rushed and we miss the opportunity to really absorb the emotions and implications of certain scenes. Almut’s Career: A Missed Opportunity One of the elements I found missing from We Live in Time was a deeper dive into Almut’s career as a chef.
What sacrifices have you made to get where you are?
We’re told that cooking is her passion, but the film doesn’t spend much time exploring why it’s so important to her. What role does cooking play in your identity and how does it contrast with your personal struggles? By ignoring this aspect, the film misses an opportunity to add depth to his character. This would have helped not only connect the viewer more with her journey, but also make her internal conflict of balancing career and family feel more urgent and relatable.
Product Placement: Distraction Let’s talk about Weetabix Moments
When the product literally becomes part of the conversation, it feels like the movie just took a quick break from selling breakfast. It’s a moment that makes you wonder, “How much did Weetabix pay for this?” It didn’t ruin the movie, but it definitely could have done without the snack commercial midway through the movie. Strong performances hold it together Despite its flaws, We Live in Time is held together by incredible performances from Garfield and Pugh. Their chemistry alone makes the film worth watching.
Both actors are able to convey raw emotion deeply, carrying the weight of the film’s emotional core
Conclusion In the end, We Live in Time is not a revolutionary film, but it is sincere. It’s a deeply personal story of love, time and loss, and while it doesn’t always hit every emotional beat, it still offers moments of true beauty. If you’re a fan of character-driven romance and strong performances, this is a movie worth checking out. Check out our list of exciting new films from this year’s film festivals, including Venice, TIFF, New York Film Festival and more.
دیدگاهتان را بنویسید